Showing posts with label Evaluation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Evaluation. Show all posts

What can a Best in Class ERP implementation do for you?

Last week I got the opportunity to attend a seminar on new technology trends around enterprise applications hosted by one of the leading consultancy companies. The seminar was very informative and lot of participants like me were excited about the new options that are opening up in enterprise applications field to take leverage from and further improve the efficiencies and effectiveness of teams and operations, specially supply chain and financials. I got to meet few industry leaders also who shared their viewpoints about the successes and failures they had around deployment of erp solutions and whether their expectations were met or not after this initiative. As always, the views varied but a question that almost everyone had, was how to evaluate whether they have the best of the solutions as per their industry standards and organizational needs, is it dependent on the results alone or do we have some other parameters also to check if we were successful enough or say best in class in this intiative.

To answer this, let me share some results from so called "Best in Class" implementations that I have witnessed during my career. For an organization where supply chain was their major pain area with inflated but incorrect inventory, haywire manufacturing schedule compliance etc., the results they could finally achieve were:
  • 23% reduction in inventory
  • 98% accuracy in inventory
  • 35% improvement in perfect orders
  • 94% on time delivery (up from approximately 78% - this there was no trusted means to measure it earlier)
  • 93% manufacturting schedule compliance - this was most difficult to achieve for them as lot of change management was involved
  • 24% reduction in item obsolescence
Having given above example, it is not that all results of an ERP implementation are tangible and if you do not get them, your initiative is a failure. NO, this is not at all the case. Process standardization, greater compliance towards regulators as well as putting controls in place to reduce revenue leakage in multiple ways and having a single source of truth are few of those non tangible benefits that you will get from a successful ERP implementation and they should also be given equal weightage while evaluating the success or failure of your project. For example, for a project based organization, one of the most important benefits will be to restrict buyers to their budgets as defined in the application so that the sanctity of budget is maintained and the management knows at all point of times, that what is the current status, how much they have to spend in the coming period etc. Also, this will ensure that people start giving accurate budgets so that they do not have to go to the route of getting it revised whenever they exceed it - and believe me getting your budget revised is not an easy task in any organization.

Then, opportunities like scalability, easy reporting, manage growth, ability to do actual costing and better calculations of profit margins, collaboration with suppliers and customers etc. are equally priceless which we tend to miss while trying to measure the value that was brought by an ERP implementation.

The list is endless and depends on what do you expect from your project - while it is ideal to say that we need to define and detail out in advance about the parameters and objectives - but in real world, it is difficult to get this done at a granular level, specially if you are implementing ERP for a first time and not moving from one to another. So, it is better to start measuring the project success after 6-9 months of going live and after checking the improvements that you could see in your operations.

Evaluate your ERP Service Provider before awarding the project

As we entered in 2010, business bid goodbye to recession and economy started looking up once again. ERP projects, once again have become the toast of the IT landscape of an organization and the service providers have revamped their sales pitches as well as stories on their successful projects with magnified benefits. Lot of times, SMB organizations get lost in these sales pitches by the flashy service providers and take a decision that backfires after some time when they see either the quality of the resources is not as expected or the provider did not have prior experience in their niche industry or the provider under quoted just to build their competency in that area/technology and lacks any best practices, tools or prior experience. There are more reasons other than these 3 which start pinching the SMBs.

Though key research websites like Gartner, Forrester, AMRResearch etc. keep on evaluating the service providers and sell their reports to their clients but still either these reports do not cover some aspects that SMBs will want details on or these SMBs are reluctant to buy these costly reports just to know which service providers are good. So, what do we do to tackle this? I understand that not all smaller companies have the expertise and the resources to do a research on this subject and come out with their own decisions but a checklist of parameters will always help them to ask the prospective providers certain questions which can assist to take informed decisions.

Normally, we tend to gather information on:
  • Size and reach of service provider
  • Related industry Expertise
  • Global capabilities like offshoring and BCP, DRP
  • Prior experience in related technology
  • Related technology practice size
  • Success stories/case studies
  • Alliances, Awards and other industry recognition
  • Experience in Implementation and Support of ERP applications
  • Length of period they are in business
  • Financial stability
Above information is very important but is not sufficient at least for SMBs who have less capacity to take risks. The additional parameters that I suggest should be part of your evaluation exercise are:
  • Ability & pace to deploy resources (can be gauged from their average bench size)
  • Specific language skills availability (specially for European organizations)
  • References from few customers in similar industry
  • Geographical presence and experience
  • Accelerators availability for related technology
  • Project Management resource pool & success stories
  • Change Management and Knowledge Management practices
  • Training tools and techniques
  • Automation capabilities in testing
  • Related industry specific process experts availability
  • Quality control and management practices
  • Process re-engineering experience
  • ERP related products or enhancements/bolt-ons availability
  • End to end solutions capability that includes licensing co-ordination, server sizing, application hosting, solution deployment and support
  • Production cut-over or black-out period practices
  • SLA based performance report card from previous engagements
  • Attrition management to make sure project is not negatively impacted by it
  • Thought leadership examples
  • Finally check the billing rates, overall cost, productivity track records and their overall value creation ability
Though some of the parameters can be measured easily by building a cross question list and seeking answers from prospective vendors but some will need deep dive and probably a site visit of short listed 2-3 vendors will be extremely helpful in evaluating and selecting an ERP service providers that can partner with you for the business transformation exercise you are planning to take in your organization.